Grizzly Bear Hunting Moratoriums in Canada

In March of 2006, the government of Albertapublishing the truth in order to truly measure
imposed a ban on the hunting of grizzly bears forpublic opinion. When commissioned by the
sport. The move showed a considerable lack ofInternational Fund for Animal Welfare to poll
reaction when compared to a similar ban bypeople’s reaction to the ban, COMPASS
British Columbia in 2001, and indeed a comparisondirectors acted shocked when the numbers
of the actions in the two provinces sheds a lot ofreflected a staggering majority favored the ban.
light on the ridiculousness of the whole scenarioWhile they did disclose that only 800 people from
surrounding the decision in British Columbia.around the province (which has a population of
The moratorium on grizzly bears in Alberta wasover 4 million) were polled, they forgot to add
not spearheaded by a coalition of environmentalhow many from each area were included. They
groups who believe in preservation at all costs. Ondid disclose that five “areas” of
the contrary, it seems as if some of the moreBritish Columbia were included in the survey, but
famous, if less reputable, groups such as theleft out the fact that three of the five were
World Wildlife Fund were totally in the dark aboutmajor metropolitan areas whose population are
the decision. As late as October of 2006, themade up mostly of people who had probably
WWF was sponsoring update shows on manynever seen a grizzly bear, much less ventured
stations wherein Kelsey Grammar called the policyinto the wilderness areas they occupied.
regarding the grizzly bear hunt in Alberta intoComments by survey director Conrad Winn
question. It looks like the WWF missed the bulletinfurther clarified his institution’s approach to
about the new policy.the study, as he suggested that the group only
The hunt in British Columbia was a differentsurveyed people who had recently moved to B.C
matter entirely. The ban came about on the evefrom the east.
of an election that was to see the annihilation ofWilderness hunting outfitters in Canada and
the highly unpopular New Democrat Party. In aoutdoor enthusiasts breathed a sigh of relief when
last ditch attempt to gain some votes, Premierthe Liberals came into power and immediately
Ujal Dosanjh suddenly announced a moratorium onlifted the ban. The province currently sees 400
the grizzly bear hunt, a program that brought ingrizzlies a year harvested, with 60% being taken
huge amounts of money from foreign huntersby resident hunters and the other 40% taken by
and which was needed to keep the grizzlyforeign big game hunters, who make a major
population in check. The move was quicklycontribution to the province’s economy.
overturned when the Liberal party swept intoBear experts suggest grizzlies continue to thrive in
power, and has been kept in place ever since.the province, with suggestions that in order to
Among the issues that stand out when reactioneven keep the bear numbers even, the hunt
to the two provinces’ policies fromwould need to be doubled. With the current
environmental groups is considered is how veryharvest, many believe that grizzly numbers will
little input and reaction there was on the Albertacontinue to grow, with the potential of more bear
front. Environmental groups suggested at the timehuman conflicts, livestock predation, and lower
of the B.C. ban that grizzly populations in thenumbers of wild ungulates as some of the results.
entire province were as low as 4,000 bears (thisAs grizzly bears are highly aggressive to their
was in contrast to the government numbers ofown species, more numbers of mature male
10,000, which in turn were low compared tobears might mean that less sows and cubs are
biologist counts which put the number of grizzliesleft alive at the end of each season due to male
at 12,000 or higher). Best estimates from all sideskill rates (one study showed that in three weeks,
puts the number of grizzlies in Alberta at onlyone Alpha male was responsible for killing and
700, a figure that is staggeringly low when oneeating nine other grizzlies in his range; three sows
considers that it includes the healthy grizzlyand their cubs of the year).
populations of Banff and Jasper National Parks.It is the responsibility of every outdoor enthusiast
One can only assume that environmental groupsto protect the nature and the animals that remind
missed their research on the desperate situationof why we love the outdoors. As the ludicrous
of the grizzlies in Alberta, where about tensituation in B.C. demonstrated, however, all people
grizzlies were taken each year previous to thetruly interested in keeping the wild,
ban.‘wild’ must approach controversial
Another stand-out issue in the B.C. ban was thematters in an informed manner, with a willingness
incredible callousness of pollsters andto learn from the facts.
environmental groups alike when it came to