Everything about fox hunting
 

Welcome to our fox hunting Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

Article #157: Grizzly Bear Hunting Moratoriums in Canada

(Browse for more articles)

 
In March of 2006, the government of was the incredible callousness of
Alberta imposed a ban on the hunting of pollsters and environmental groups alike
grizzly bears for sport. The move showed when it came to publishing the truth in
a considerable lack of reaction when order to truly measure public opinion.
compared to a similar ban by British When commissioned by the International
Columbia in 2001, and indeed a comparison Fund for Animal Welfare to poll people's
of the actions in the two provinces sheds reaction to the ban, COMPASS directors
a lot of light on the ridiculousness of acted shocked when the numbers reflected
the whole scenario surrounding the a staggering majority favored the ban.
decision in British Columbia. While they did disclose that only 800
The moratorium on grizzly bears in people from around the province (which
Alberta was not spearheaded by a has a population of over 4 million) were
coalition of environmental groups who polled, they forgot to add how many from
believe in preservation at all costs. On each area were included. They did
the contrary, it seems as if some of the disclose that five "areas" of British
more famous, if less reputable, groups Columbia were included in the survey, but
such as the World Wildlife Fund were left out the fact that three of the five
totally in the dark about the decision. were major metropolitan areas whose
As late as October of 2006, the WWF was population are made up mostly of people
sponsoring update shows on many stations who had probably never seen a grizzly
wherein Kelsey Grammar called the policy bear, much less ventured into the
regarding the grizzly bear hunt in wilderness areas they occupied. Comments
Alberta into question. It looks like the by survey director Conrad Winn further
WWF missed the bulletin about the new clarified his institution's approach to
policy. the study, as he suggested that the group
The hunt in British Columbia was a only surveyed people who had recently
different matter entirely. The ban came moved to B.C from the east.
about on the eve of an election that was Wilderness hunting outfitters in Canada
to see the annihilation of the highly and outdoor enthusiasts breathed a sigh
unpopular New Democrat Party. In a last of relief when the Liberals came into
ditch attempt to gain some votes, Premier power and immediately lifted the ban. The
Ujal Dosanjh suddenly announced a province currently sees 400 grizzlies a
moratorium on the grizzly bear hunt, a year harvested, with 60% being taken by
program that brought in huge amounts of resident hunters and the other 40% taken
money from foreign hunters and which was by foreign big game hunters, who make a
needed to keep the grizzly population in major contribution to the province's
check. The move was quickly overturned economy. Bear experts suggest grizzlies
when the Liberal party swept into power, continue to thrive in the province, with
and has been kept in place ever since. suggestions that in order to even keep
Among the issues that stand out when the bear numbers even, the hunt would
reaction to the two provinces' policies need to be doubled. With the current
from environmental groups is considered harvest, many believe that grizzly
is how very little input and reaction numbers will continue to grow, with the
there was on the Alberta front. potential of more bear/human conflicts,
Environmental groups suggested at the livestock predation, and lower numbers of
time of the B.C. ban that grizzly wild ungulates as some of the results. As
populations in the entire province were grizzly bears are highly aggressive to
as low as 4,000 bears (this was in their own species, more numbers of mature
contrast to the government numbers of male bears might mean that less sows and
10,000, which in turn were low compared cubs are left alive at the end of each
to biologist counts which put the number season due to male kill rates (one study
of grizzlies at 12,000 or higher). Best showed that in three weeks, one Alpha
estimates from all sides puts the number male was responsible for killing and
of grizzlies in Alberta at only 700, a eating nine other grizzlies in his range;
figure that is staggeringly low when one three sows and their cubs of the year).
considers that it includes the healthy It is the responsibility of every outdoor
grizzly populations of Banff and Jasper enthusiast to protect the nature and the
National Parks. One can only assume that animals that remind of why we love the
environmental groups missed their outdoors. As the ludicrous situation in
research on the desperate situation of B.C. demonstrated, however, all people
the grizzlies in Alberta, where about ten truly interested in keeping the wild,
grizzlies were taken each year previous 'wild' must approach controversial
to the ban. matters in an informed manner, with a
Another stand-out issue in the B.C. ban willingness to learn from the facts.






1- A- B- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48- 49- 50- 51- 52- 53- 54- 55-