Why Hunting is Good For the Environment

I'm a hunter, and since small game season hasindividual states the contribution of hunters is
started and large game is right around the cornermore profound because of all the money raised
I've justifiably been getting excited. Of course thisfrom hunting licenses. In New York State those
time of year also means that all my anti-huntinglicenses provide 57% of the Department of
friends feel the need the lecture me on how badEnvironmental Conservation's budget, which is
hunting is and how I shouldn't "kill Bambi." As I'mhuge given that there are only 700,000 hunters in
tired of hearing this all the time, I'm going toa state of 19 million people. To put it in simpler
explain why hunting is good.terms, hunters pay more than 10x as much as
First I want to address those people who think it'snon-hunters to fund state lands, and the parks on
horrible to kill defenseless animals. Guess what?them which everyone enjoys. While it's easy for
They were probably going to die anyway, andanti-hunter to drum up support by saying animals
here's why. Every acre of land has a carryingshouldn't be killed, if the general public knew what
capacity, which is the population of an animal thatkind of tax increase it would take to make up for
can survive on it indefinitely. Governments usethe lost revenue of hunting licenses then I think
that number to set hunting quotas so they canthe general public would support it a lot more.
make sure that hunters don't lower the populationFinally, one more thing that's important to
of a species to less than it would normally goremember is that animals pose a real threat to
from natural causes. If you look at the chart ondrivers and farmers. It's estimated that deer
the right you'll see that in general, during thealone cause hundreds of millions of dollars a year
spring and summer there are a lot of animals, andin damage to crops, and more than that in car
during the winter there are a lot less. So basicallyaccidents. I'm not saying that increased hunting
if hunters shoot 100 deer in an area, all that'swould get rid of these problems, but getting rid of
happening is that those deer are being shothunting would certainly make them much worse.
instead of starving to death. I know that this is allRegardless of all these stats, I'm not trying to
based on the land carrying capacity estimates andsay that everyone should hunt or that you're a
that people aren't perfect, but each year thesebad person if you dislike hunting. There are plenty
things are reevaluated, and if one year too manyof perfectly legitimate things that people do that I
animals are taken then the next year the huntingwould never want to, and I don't want anyone
permits are decreased.hassling me to try them. My problem is only with
Another thing that anti-hunters don't recognize ispeople who don't like hunting and don't want
that each year hunters raise a huge amount ofanyone else to be able to do it either. Whether
money for conservation. There are federal exciseyou're for it or against it, you can't deny the
taxes on everything hunters use, from bullets toenvironmental and economic benefits of hunting,
guns to camouflage jackets, and all that money isso instead of saying something dumb like "don't
used for national parks and conservation. In theshoot Bambi", from now on just stay quiet.