Sustainable Development and Politics

Sustainable Development: Any construction thatlevels of contaminants. Any breach in a holding
can be maintained over time without damagingpond, waste system or cooling system could
the environment; development balancinghave a detrimental impact on nearby water on
near-term interests with the protection of theboth aquatic life and water quality for humans.
interests of future generations.The method of disposing of these contaminated
National Interest: A state's national interest is multiwaters would be discharging them into water
faceted. National interest is simply a statessources but in limited amounts. The aquatic
interest in its security and survival. In the modernorganisms are not the only life forms at risk.
world, however, it is considered to be a statesVarious birds and animals rely on the existence of
ambition towards the growth of its economy,clean water and CRP for their very survival.
wealth, and power.There have been proposals to completely
Alternate Energy: The umbrella term that referseliminate the CRP program in Iowa. In some
to any source of usable energy intended tostates, such as South Dakota and Iowa, CRP will
replace fuel sources without the undesiredbe eliminated by up to 60 percent in the next
consequences of the replaced fuels.year. The species particularly affected by this
The United States' undesired increase oflegislation is the Ring-Neck Pheasant. Iowa is
dependency of oil from the Middle East coupledcurrently one of the most sought after pheasant
with the public's increased awareness of thehunting destinations in United States. State wide,
negative environmental impact of fossil fuelIowa grosses over 90 million dollars annually from
emissions, has caused a public outcry for alternatepheasant hunters. Pheasant hunting is an industry
sources of energy. In the wake of the turmoil inin rural parts of some states that many people
the middle-east and their love of theirdepend on to make a living. The population of
environment, Americans have sought alternatepheasants is expected to decline by 55 percent
sources of energy. Through their impatient naturedue to the loss of CRP habitat. Bird populations
of and lack of skepticism, Americans have allowedsuch as the Northern Harrier and the Henslow
themselves to be led to believe that ethanol is theSparrow are two other species that will be
solution that reduces our dependency of fossilthreatened should current CRP lands be
fuel. What is also failed to be realized is thesignificantly reduced.
implications of ethanol. Ethanol production is veryThe effect that ethanol has on the environment
impractical and furthermore, it has caused a riseare very unappealing. From an efficiency stand
of inflation and food shortages. Our currentpoint, corn ethanol is not a viable option to replace
methods for creating ethanol are as inefficient asfossil fuels. On the brighter side, new technologies
they are detrimental to the environment.on the not so distant horizon may enable us to
Currently, corn is the main source of ethanol.switch to ethanol as an alternative fuel. Research
It is harvested and sold to ethanol plants where itand development have explored the possibility of
is then broken down and fermented into ethylobtaining ethanol from more efficient sources.
alcohol. It is then mixed with gasoline, labeling itOne particular species that has gained a lot of
E-85, eighty-five percent ethanol and fifteenattention is switch grass. Bio-genetic engineers
percent gasoline. What is often overlooked andhave created a strain of switch grass that can
unrealized is the actual amount of land and energygrow up to 10 feet tall. The level of efficiency is
required to create ethanol. In order to make onefar better than corn. Comparably, switch grass
gallon of ethanol, approximately twenty-sixruns at 700 percent efficiency, superior to corn's
pounds of corn is required. One acre of land can64 percent. There are other positive facts about
produce 7,110 pounds of corn, which translatesswitch grass that make it very appealing. Switch
into 328 gallons of ethanol. With that in mind, onegrass grows fast and it is not a 'row crop' like
might ask, 'how much corn would it take tocorn. Switch grass grows just like other prairie
produce enough for the United States to begrasses, which would reduce the amount of
independent of imported fossil fuels?' Someerosion. Furthermore, switch grass provides much
researches estimate that if all available farmlandbetter cover and habitat for species such as the
was subsidized for ethanol production, there wouldRing Necked Pheasant.
only be enough to power about 4 percent of theSwitch grass is certainly another option that
United States' energy needs on a net basis. Withshould be explored. There are several other
the current technology used in ethanol production,sources of energy in development that may also
it is impossible to completely become fossil fueldecrease our dependency on fossil fuels as well.
energy independent. Ethanol is not only impracticalWind energy, hydroelectric and hydrogen are all
but is also very inefficient. It is widely debated aspotentially environmental friendly alternate fuel
to whether ethanol, as a fuel, results in net gainssources. Hydrogen power is an energy source
in energy or losses.that has not been thoroughly explored, but could
Most recent studies have shown that it takespotentially be the cleanest and cheapest form of
more energy to produce it than is actually gained.energy. Hydrogen is the most abundant resource
When the energy associated with planting,on our planet. It can even be harvested from
fertilizing, maintenance, harvesting, transporting,algae. Transforming hydrogen into a usable energy
and production are all taken into consideration; itform is very difficult, dangerous and inefficient
takes roughly 1 unit of energy to produce .64with the present technology. Hydrogen is still very
units of energy. So corn ethanol runs on only 64far from being used as a fuel source. But with
percent efficiency. One must consider fuelcontinued effort of technological advancement
sustainability when we lose 46 percent of theand further research, hydrogen could very well
energy involved in production on a net basis. Withbecome a potential source for alternate energy.
so much corn demanded for the production ofConcerning the topic of sustainability, corn ethanol
ethanol, the question of its effect on food supplyis not a technique that should be employed as an
and demand is raised. What does the future ofalternate energy source.
the food supply and demand look like, given thatThere is net energy loss when producing ethanol.
the 'eviro-friendly' ethanol fuel is employed?If more energy is used in producing ethanol than
Ethanol production is dramatically affecting notis actually gained, then how can it be rationalized
only the United States; it is affecting the entireas an alternate energy source? Soil degradation
world's food market. With the sudden spike inwill also become a major concern should corn
demand for corn, a result in ethanol production,ethanol production continue. As stated earlier, corn
prices in food have become very inflated. Milkwould be planted continuously, causing erosion and
prices have increased by over 200 percent, cornelevate the chemical contaminant levels in the
prices have quadrupled in one year causingenvironment. This would decrease the lifespan of
starvation and unrest in many third worldmany valuable water sources and destroy the
countries. Countries including Mexico, Indonesia,environments that many species depend on. So
Yemen, and Egypt are all feeling the sting ofas the United States moves toward ethanol,
shortages and high food prices. In Mexico, theremore land will be required to meet the quantity of
were 'tortilla riots', a result of the high prices forcorn demanded. This will decrease the land
corn flour. Mexico's poorest citizens diet consistsdesignated for soybean, rice, grains and livestock.
mainly of tortillas. If the price increases of cornInevitably this shortage of food supply will inflate
flour continues, malnourishment and starvation isprices of food to the point where poorer people
certain to accelerate. Mexico's officials have triedwill no longer be able to afford them. This could
to put a price cap on the price of corn flour butcause unrest globally. Should we proceed with this
shopkeepers simply cannot maintain such lowstrategy of corn ethanol as our alternate energy
prices when the prices they par are so high.source, we could possibly degrade the soil to the
In other third world countries such as Egypt, foodpoint where we could no longer farm it, One must
shortages have caused unrest and have nurturednow ask, is ethanol really the answer to saving
Islamic radicalism. Does Ethanol help us with onethe environment and protecting our national
problem or just create others? As more corninterest? Or is it simply politicians pandering to a
goes into ethanol production the necessity for landvoting bloc?
designated to corn growth will increase everyAfter weighing the gains and losses in of our
year. To counter overproduction, maintain marketnational interest, it can be concluded that we
balance and keep a healthy environment, the USwould lose more than we will gain should we
government implemented a program calledsubstitute corn ethanol for fossil fuels. First, I will
Conservation Reserve Program (commonlylay out the gains should we commit to ethanol
referred to as CRP) in the 1950's. CRP is aproduction. We could become energy independent,
program that subsidizes land to reduce erosion,and no longer rely on the Middle East for oil. For
increase habitat for wildlife and stop overthis reason, many people endorse the idea of
production of crops. The farmer agrees to letethanol. We are currently at war with many
these subsidized areas grow into wild grass andMiddle Eastern countries and on tense terms with
plant reserves. The CRP program is veryseveral others. Should we have to commit to war
important to environmental enhancement in areaswith any other countries, we must have our own
all over the United States, especially the mid-west.source of energy.
As the demand for ethanol increases, farmers willThe environment, in some ways, is a beneficiary
begin to search for ways to maximize they'reto the ethanol switch. Ethanol burns far cleaner
production of corn. Corn requires a fall tillage whichthan any fossil fuel, leaving a much smaller carbon
leaves the soil barren between October and June.foot print. Engines run more efficiently and are
In areas where ground is most vulnerable, such asoften cleaned, reducing the amount of sludge
steep inclines, CRP is planted to prevent erosion.buildup in the engine. These are some of the
An erosion experiment was conducted at thepotential gains to our national interest should we
Rathburn Lake Watershed in Iowa. Afterswitch to ethanol. In my opinion, the negative
converting approximately 29 percent of the mostaffects outweigh the gains. Ethanol is inefficient; it
erosive land (approximately 4 percent of therequires more energy to produce a unit of energy
entire lake's watershed) into row crops from CRP,than is gained. It will cost more to produce the
an increase in erosion was very apparent.fuel than will be gained from it. Although fossil
By replacing the CRP with row crops (corn is afuels run at about 84 percent efficiency, it still is
row crop), the erosion increased by 204,000 tonsbetter than the 64 percent efficiency of ethanol.
of sediment per year. That was four times theEthanol production will endanger or cause species
government's acceptable level of annual erosionto become extinct. This could create ecosystem
for Rathburn Lake's watershed. As the demandproblems by allowing certain species to proliferate
for cellulosic ethanol production increases, thewhile devastating others. Our soil quality will
affect on sustainable soil quality remains uncertain.diminish, making it harder for future generations
Farming corn is very clean. After a harvest, thereto sustain a high quality of life. If the demand for
is little to no residual crops left. Therefore, incorn continues to rise, food shortages are
order for there to be any nutrients in the soil,imminent. It will inflate the cost of food and
farmers must inject pesticides and fertilizers intodecrease the amount of available food world wide.
the soil in order to plant corn the following year. InIt will make it harder for poorer Americans to
addition to the increase of sediment flowing intopay for food. People could resort to crime as a
water sources, the amount of chemicals comesway to survive. In other countries poorer people
into consideration. As a result of the increasedwill no longer be able to afford food at such a
amount of phosphorus at Lake Rathburn, an algaehigh price, leading to starvation and
growth was stimulated in conjunction with themalnourishment.
increase of sediment deposition. This spike in algaeSo why should Americans care? As seen in
growth shortened the lifespan of the lake.Egypt, Yemen, Bangladesh, and even Mexico,
As a consequence of the increase of pesticidesfood shortages cause unrest and a rise in
and fertilizers such as nitrate, the water willradicalism. In Egypt, a rise in radicalism was
become unsuitable for humans to drink and fornoticed when the supply of corn was reduced and
aquatic life to live in. Exposed farmland sprayedthe price was increased. In Mexico, thousands of
with fertilizers and pesticides will wash pollutantsdemonstrators rioted over the high price of corn
into water sources potentially killing aquatic life andflour. Impoverished people will resort to crime and
becoming toxic for humans to drink. In the city ofrevolt if that is what it takes to keep them fed.
Doon, where the city's water head is farmland,Ethanol is not the answer to our problems. It is in
the nitrate levels exceeded legal limits by 10 to 40effect the grounds for more problems to surface
percent. Furthermore, regarding water quality,and for existing problems to deteriorate even
waste after ethanol production, is very high infurther.