American Indians and Subsistence on the Great Plains of North America 10,000 Years Ago

When the ancestors of today’s Americansubsistence activities because the preservation of
Indian, Alaskan Natives, and First Nation peoplesthe bones of large-bodied animals is significantly
migrated to the Americas, the variety and typesgreater than the remains of small game, thus
of animals encountered were very different thanleading archaeologists to initially conclude that early
those of northeast Asia. These early migrants hadAmerican Indians hunted large mammals almost
to learn how to hunt and subsist not only in aexclusively.
new land, but also on new plants and animals. Yet,Despite these facts arguing for a new
as is well established, these early American Indiansunderstanding, a number of researchers continued
were excellent innovators, and shortly afterto maintain into the late 1980s and early 1990s
migrating to the Americas had learned how tothat large mammal hunting was not only a critical
flourish in their new land. What these earlycomponent of early American Indian daily
American Indians hunted, how they moved acrosssubsistence, but also greatly contributed to their
the land, and what their general lifeway patterntechnology, mobility, and land use strategies.
looked like has always been of interest toSome even pointed to large-game hunting as a
archaeologists, anthropologists, and othersprimary causal factor in the extinction of
interested in the peopling of the Americas. ToPleistocene megafauna.
investigate these questions, researchers haveThese conclusions, however, can no longer
come up with several ingenious methods, one ofreasonably be supported, and there is now
which is called “prey choice.” Prey choiceoverwhelming evidence arguing that early
is the examination and analysis of the animalsAmerican Indians, like their modern-day relatives,
found in archaeological sites (the prey) in order toutilized a wide variety of floral and faunal
gain insights into the diet, subsistence technologies,resources as part of their subsistence pattern. For
and general lifeway patterns (the choice) of theseexample, research by Matthew E. Hill, Jr., at the
early American Indians.University of Iowa indicates that different site
Recent research using this method has providedtypes provide different perspectives on early
some key insights into the peopling of theAmerican Indian faunal use. Using data from 60
Americas and the subsistence patterns of earlysites, Hill concluded that early American Indians
American Indians who lived during what is calledhunted not only bison and mammoth, but also
the Paleoindian period (13,500-8,000 years beforerabbits, turtles, pronghorn, deer, bighorn sheep,
present). During the Paleoindian period it has longprairie dogs, beavers, snakes, canids, fish,
been argued that American Indian foragers’badgers, bears, raccoon, muskrat, and many
diets were quite narrow; groups using Clovis toolother species.
technology were thought to subsist almostWhat this evidence reveals is that early American
entirely on mammoths, while later groups usingIndian diets were highly environmentally
Folsom and subsequent technologies were thoughtcontextualized. For example, when early American
to have hunted mainly bison. This concept of earlyIndians were in the low diversity grasslands of the
American Indians as specialized big-game huntersHigh Plains and Rolling Hills of the Great Plains, they
persisted through the 1960s and 1970s, despitehunted almost exclusively large fauna, especially
discovery of a few sites showing evidence forbison, for the entire 5,000 years of the Paleoindian
use of small game. Beginning in the late 1980s,period. This strategy was possible because
however, the view of early American Indians asgrassland environments maintained large herds of
large mammal hunting specialists began to bebison despite drastic environmental change
questioned for several reasons. First, studies ofthrough the Late Quaternary. However, when
modern hunter-gatherers suggested thatearly American Indians were in more diverse
specialized large mammal hunting strategies wereenvironments such as alluvial valleys and foothill
economically unfeasible and possibly evenmountain environments, a higher diversity of
dangerous to the hunters. Second, modelsfauna were used. Although large game continued
proposing a big-game emphasis on a continentalto be of importance in these environments, other
scale ignored regions, such as eastern Northspecies were also hunted when available.
America and the Great Basin, where there wasThe empirical evidence overwhelmingly argues
little evidence for the exploitation of large game.that early American Indians relied on a broad,
Third, early research was influenced by biases ingeneral subsistence pattern during the Paleoindian
the type of sites (mostly kill and carcassperiod. This overall subsistence pattern continued
processing sites) and the location where researchas other components of these early American
occurred (primarily in the Great Plains),Indian lifeway patterns evolved into the Archaic
erroneously pointing toward a specialized huntingperiod (8,000-1,000 years before present) and as
model of subsistence. Finally, large-game hunting issubsequent generations built upon their ancestors
more archaeologically visible than othertraditions.